Praise be to Allah
With regard to the ignorant person who does acts of kufr or shirk, one of the following two scenarios must apply:
-1-
The first scenario is: he is not Muslim, whether he follows another religion or does not have a religion.
If
that is the case, then such a person is a disbeliever, whether he knows
what he is doing or is ignorant, or he is basing his disbelief on some
misinterpretation. He is not subject to the same rulings as a Muslim in
this world, and he is subject to the rulings on disbelievers, because he
has not entered Islam in the first place, so how can we deem him to be
Muslim when he has never claimed to be Muslim?
With regard to
the hereafter, if he was truly ignorant, and the call of Islam never
reached him at all, or it reached him in a distorted manner in such a
way that proof is not established against one like him, then with regard
to his fate on the Day of Resurrection, there was a lengthy debate
among the scholars.
The most correct scholarly view concerning
him is that he will be tested on the Day of Resurrection. Then whoever
obeys Allah will enter Paradise, and whoever disobeys Him will enter
Hell.
There are numerous reports which state that in the case of
a person whom with the message did not reach in this world, a messenger
will be sent to him on the Day of Resurrection.
End quote from Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (17/308)
This has been discussed previously in the answers to questions no. 1244 and 215066
-2-
The
second scenario is: he claims to be a Muslim and fulfils the conditions
of being described as such, and he openly declares his complete belief
in Islam and his belief in the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah
be upon him).
In the case of such a person, if he does a deed
that makes him a disbeliever out of ignorance, he is not to be deemed a
disbeliever because of that, and the description of being Muslim is not
to be taken away from him, unless proof that he is wrong is established
and is explained to him.
With regard to anyone who believes in
Allah and His Messenger and remains steadfast in obeying them, but
denies some of that which the Messenger brought, out of ignorance or
lack of knowledge that the Messenger brought it – even though that
constitutes disbelief and the one who does it is a disbeliever – the
fact that he was ignorant of what the Messenger brought makes it
disallowed to deem that particular person a disbeliever, regardless of
whether the matter has to do with a fundamental or minor issue, because
disbelief means rejecting what the Messenger brought, or rejecting some
of it, knowingly.
Thus you may know the difference between the
disbeliever who disbelieves in the Messenger and the believer who
rejects some of what he brought out of ignorance and misguidance, not
knowingly and out of stubbornness.
End quote from al-Fataawa
as-Sa‘diyyah (p. 443-447) The excuse of ignorance is something that is
valid and established with regard to all issues of religion, whether
they are issues of belief, tawheed and shirk, or issues of fiqhi
rulings.
The fact that a Muslim may be excused for ignorance
with regard to matters of belief is indicated by several points of
shar‘i evidence, as follows:
1.
The shar‘i texts which indicate that the one who makes
mistakes is excused, such as the verse in which Allah, may He be
exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning): “Our Lord! Punish us not
if we forget or fall into error” [al-Baqarah 2:286]. And Allah, may He
be exalted, said [in a hadith qudsi]: “I have granted that”, as is
narrated in Saheeh Muslim (126).
And Allah, may He be exalted,
says (interpretation of the meaning): “And there is no sin on you if you
make a mistake therein, except in regard to what your hearts
deliberately intend. And Allah is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful”
[al-Ahzaab 33:5].
And the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah
be upon him) said: “Allah has forgiven my ummah their mistakes and
forgetfulness, and what they are forced to do.” Classed as hasan by
al-Albaani.
These texts indicate that whoever does something
that is contrary to what he is obliged to do, because he forgot or out
of ignorance, is to be pardoned. The one who is mistaken also includes
the one who is ignorant, because the one who is mistaken is anyone who
does something contrary to the truth without intending to.
Shaykh
‘Abd ar-Rahmaan as-Sa‘di said: This is general in meaning and applies
to every case in which the believers make mistakes, whether it has to do
with deeds or beliefs.
End quote from al-Irshaad ila Ma‘rifat al-Ahkaam (p. 208)
Shaykh
Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Ignorance is
undoubtedly a mistake. Based on that, if a person does something that
constitutes disbelief, in word or deed, not knowing that it constitutes
disbelief – i.e., he is ignorant of the shar‘i evidence – then he is not
to be deemed a disbeliever.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said:
Allah, may He be exalted, said in the Qur’an (interpretation of the
meaning): “Our Lord! Punish us not if we forget or fall into error”
[al-Baqarah 2:286]. And Allah, may He be exalted, said [in a hadith
qudsi]: “I have granted that”, And He did not differentiate between
mistakes with regard to definitive issues or issues based on
probability… So whoever says that the one who is mistaken with regard to
definitive issues or issues based on probability is sinning has gone
against the Qur’an, the Sunnah and the consensus of the early
generations.
End quote from Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (19/210).
And
he said: Moreover, my attitude – and those who have spent time with me
know that about me – is that I am the one who most emphatically forbids
deeming a specific person to be a disbeliever, evildoer or sinner,
unless it is known that definitive proof has been established against
him, of the kind of proof that anyone who goes against it or rejects it
becomes a disbeliever, evildoer or sinner. I affirm here that Allah has
forgiven this ummah for their mistakes, which includes mistakes in
issues of beliefs, words and practical actions.
End quote from Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (3/229)
Ibn
al-‘Arabi said: With regard to the ignorant and those who make mistakes
among this ummah, even if they do acts that constitute disbelief and
shirk, the kind of deeds that result in the doer being deemed a mushrik
or a disbeliever, they are to be excused for their ignorance and
mistakes until proof is established against them, of the type of proof
that whoever rejects it becomes a disbeliever and it is clearly
explained to the degree that a man of his calibre would not be confused
after such an explanation. End quote. This was narrated from him by
al-Qaasimi in Mahaasin at-Ta’weel (3/161).
Shaykh ‘Abd
ar-Rahmaan al-Mu‘allimi said: Even if we sometimes say that this is
calling upon someone other than Allah, may He be exalted, and it is an
act of worship and shirk, we do not mean that everyone who does that is a
mushrik. Rather the mushrik is the one who does that with no excuse. As
for the one who does that with an excuse, then perhaps he is one of the
best slaves of Allah, may He be exalted and one of the most virtuous
and pious.
End quote from Athaar ash-Shaykh ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan al-Mu‘allimi (3/826)
2.
The
texts indicate that Allah’s proofs against people cannot be established
except after they have knowledge of the proof, such as the verses in
which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And We never punish unless We have sent a Messenger”
[al-Isra’ 17:15]
“Messengers
as bearers of good news as well as of warning in order that mankind
should have no plea against Allah after the Messengers. And Allah is
Ever All-Powerful, All-Wise”[an-Nisa’ 4:165]“And Allah will never lead a
people astray after He has guided them until He makes clear to them as
to what they should avoid”
[at-Tawbah 9:115]
and there are
other verses which indicate that proof cannot be established except
after knowledge and clear explanation. These verses indicate that the
accountable person is not required to carry out Islamic duties except
having acquired knowledge concerning them. If he does not know of them,
then he is excused.
Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen said, explaining what
we learn from this verse, “Messengers as bearers of good news as well as
of warning…” [an-Nisa’ 4:165]:
The most important thing we
learn is that the excuse of ignorance is a valid excuse, even with
regard to the fundamentals of religion, because the Messengers brought
both fundamental and minor issues, so if a person is ignorant and no
messenger came to him, then he has an excuse before Allah.
End quote from Tafseer Soorat an-Nisa’ (2/485).
Ibn al-Qayyim said:
The
shar‘i rulings only become binding upon a person when he reaches
puberty and when the rulings reach him. Just as the rulings are not
binding upon him before he reaches puberty, by the same token they are
not binding upon him before they reach him.
End quote from Badaa’i‘ al-Fawaa’id (4/168).
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said in ar-Radd ‘ala al-Ikhnaa’i, annoted by al-‘Anzi (p. 206):
Similarly,
if a person calls upon someone other than Allah and performs the Hajj
rituals for someone other than Allah, he is also a mushrik, and his
actions constitute disbelief, but he may not be aware that this is shirk
which is forbidden.
When many of the Tatars and others entered
Islam, they had small idols made of felt and other things, which they
sought to draw close to and venerated. They did not know that this was
prohibited in the religion of Islam. They would also seek to draw close
to (and worship) fire, not knowing that doing so is prohibited. There
are many kinds of shirk which some of those who enter Islam may be
unaware of and not realise that it is shirk. Such a person is misguided
and the deed in which he associates others with Allah is invalid, but he
does not deserve to be punished unless proof is established against
him. Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Then do not set up rivals unto Allah (in worship) while you know (that
He Alone has the right to be worshipped)” [al-Baqarah 2:22]. End quote.
3.
The texts which tell the stories of some who fell into shirk or disbelief but were excused. They include the following:
(i) The story of the man who issued instructions that his body was to be burned and who denied the power of Allah over him
It
was narrated from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that the
Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “There was a
man who transgressed against his soul (by committing a great deal of
sin). When he was dying he said to his sons: ‘When I die, burn me, then
grind my bones, then scatter me in the wind, for by Allah, if my Lord
grasps hold of me, He will punish me as He has never punished anyone
else.’ When he died, that was done to him, but Allah commanded the
earth: ‘Gather together whatever of him there is in you.’ So it did
that, then the man was standing there. Allah said: ‘What made you do
what you did?’ He said: ‘O Lord, I feared You.’ So He forgave him.”
Agreed upon.
What
this man said constituted major disbelief that puts one beyond the pale
of faith, because it was an implicit denial of the power of Allah to
gather his scattered dust after he died. Moreover the divine attribute
of power is one of the most obvious and clear of divine attributes,
which is obviously connected to the Lordship and divinity of Allah. In
fact it is one of the most significant attributes of the Lord. But this
man was not deemed a disbeliever, because he was excused for his
ignorance.
Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr said: The scholars differed
concerning the meaning of this hadith. Some of them said: This was a man
who was ignorant of one of the attributes of Allah, may He be glorified
and exalted, namely His power. So he did not know that Allah has power
to do whatever He wills. They said: If a person is ignorant of one of
the attributes of Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, but he
believes in and knows all the other divine attributes, his ignorance of
some of the attributes of Allah does not mean that he is to be deemed a
disbeliever. And they said: rather the disbeliever is the one who
stubbornly rejects the truth, not one who is ignorant of it.
This is the view of the earlier scholars and of later scholars who followed in their footsteps.
End quote from at-Tamheed lima fi’l-Muwatta’ min al-Ma‘aani wa’l-Asaaneed (18/42).
This
was a man who had some doubts about the power of Allah and His ability
to bring him back to life if his dust was scattered. Rather he believed
that Allah would not be able to resurrect him, which constitutes
disbelief according to Muslim consensus. But he was ignorant and did not
know that, although he was a believer who feared that Allah would
punish him. Therefore Allah forgave him for that.
End quote from Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (3/23 1).
He also said:
This
man believed that Allah would not be able to gather his dust if he did
that, or he doubted that Allah could do that, and believed that He would
not resurrect him. In both cases, such beliefs constitute disbelief,
and the one for whom such proof has been established is to be deemed a
disbeliever. But this man was ignorant of that and no knowledge had
reached him to dispel his ignorance, yet he had faith in Allah and
believed in His commands and prohibitions, His promises and warnings,
and therefore he feared His punishment. So Allah forgave him because of
his fear of Him.
If one of those who believe in Allah and His
Messenger and the Last Day, and do righteous deeds, make some mistakes
in their understanding of some issues of belief, they will not be worse
off than this man. Allah may forgive their errors or He may punish them,
if they fell short and do not make sufficient efforts to find out about
the truth and follow it.
As for deeming a person who is known
to have faith to be a disbeliever for simply making mistakes with regard
to some issues of belief, that is a serious matter indeed.
End quote from al-Istiqaamah (1/164)
Allah
has names and attributes that are mentioned in His Book, and of which
His Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) has told his
ummah. No one to whom proof has been presented clearly can reject that,
because they are mentioned in the Qur’an and are mentioned in saheeh
reports from the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be
upon him).
Therefore if a person goes against that after clear
proof has been presented to him, then he is a disbeliever. However,
before clear proof has been presented to him, he may be excused for his
ignorance, because knowledge of such matters cannot be figured out on
the basis of reasoning or on the basis of reflecting and thinking. We do
not deem anyone to be a disbeliever for not knowing it, except after
knowledge thereof reaches him.
End quote from Siyar A‘laam an-Nubala’ (10/79)
(ii) The story of the Children of Israel with Moosa
Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And
We brought the Children of Israel (with safety) across the sea, and
they came upon a people devoted to some of their idols (in worship).
They said: ‘O Moosa (Moses)! Make for us an ilahan (a god) as they have
aliha (gods).’ He said: ‘Verily, you are a people who know not (the
Majesty and Greatness of Allah and what is obligatory upon you, i.e., to
worship none but Allah Alone, the One and the Only God of all that
exists).’
(Moosa (Moses) added:) ‘Verily, these people will be
destroyed for that which they are engaged in (idols-worship). And all
that they are doing is in vain.’
He said: ‘Shall I seek for you
an Ilahan (a God) other than Allah, while He has given you superiority
over the Alameen (mankind and jinns of your time)?’”[al-A‘raaf
7:138-140].
They demanded that Moosa (peace be upon him) should
make them an idol so that they could seek to draw close to Allah by
worshipping it, as those mushrikeen had taken an idol for worship.
This
shows how great their ignorance was, as they thought that it was
permissible to worship something other than Allah, after they had seen
the signs.
End quote from Zaad al-Maseer (2/150)
It seems
from the response of Moosa (peace be upon him) that even though he
denounced them for their ignorance, he did not regard their demand as
apostasy from faith. This is supported by the fact that they were not
taken to task at this point as they were taken to task when they took
the calf for worship. It is as if in this instance – and Allah knows
best – they were excused because they were new in their faith.
End quote from Majmoo‘ Rasaa’il al-Mu‘allimi (1/142)
(iii) The story of Dhaat Anwaat
It
was narrated that Abu Waaqid al-Laythi said: We set out with the
Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) towards
Hunayn, and we passed by a lote-tree. We said: O Prophet of Allah, make
this into a dhaat anwaat for us as the disbelievers have a dhaat anwaat.
The disbelievers used to hang (yanootoona) their weapons on a lote-tree
and stay around it, showing devotion to it.
The Prophet
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “Allahu akbar! This is
what the Children of Israel said to Moosa, ‘Make for us a god as they
have gods’! You will certainly follow in the footsteps of those who came
before you.”
Narrated and classed as saheeh by at-Tirmidhi
(2180). It was also narrated by Imam Ahmad (21900) and classed as saheeh
by Shaykh al-Albaani.
They asked the Prophet (blessings and
peace of Allah be upon him) to do something that constituted shirk akbar
(major shirk); they wanted him to prescribe for them to hang their
weapons on trees, as the mushrikeen did. Hence the Prophet (blessings
and peace of Allah be upon him) regarded their words as being akin to
the words of the Children of Israel to Moosa.
Muhammad Rasheed
Rida said: Those who said that to the Prophet (blessings and peace of
Allah be upon him) were new Muslims who had recently given up shirk, so
they thought that if the Prophet allocated something like that for that
purpose, it would be acceptable and would not be contrary to Islam.
End quote from his comment on Majmoo‘ ar-Rasaa’il wa’l-Masaa’il an-Najdiyyah (4/39)
Shaykh
‘Abd ar-Razzaaq ‘Afeefi was asked about the grave-worshippers who
believe in the dead and ask of them. The shaykh (may Allah have mercy on
him) said: They are apostates from Islam, if proof is established
against them. Otherwise they are excused for their ignorance, like those
who asked for a dhaat anwaat.
End quote from Fataawa ash-Shaykh ‘Abd ar-Razzaaq ‘Afeefi (p. 371)
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said:
After
learning what the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)
brought, we inevitably learn that he did not prescribe for his ummah to
call upon any of the dead, whether they were Prophets, righteous people
or anyone else, whether in the sense of seeking help or otherwise,
whether by way of seeking refuge or in any other way.
Similarly,
he did not prescribe for his ummah to prostrate to anyone, dead or
otherwise, and the like. Rather we know that he prohibited all such
things, and that these things come under the heading of shirk which
Allah and His Messenger forbade.
But because of the prevalence
of ignorance and lack of knowledge of Islamic teachings among many of
the later generations, it is not possible to deem them disbelievers
because of that, until they learn and find out what the Messenger
(blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) brought, and what contradicts
it.
End quote from ar-Radd ‘ala al-Kubra (2/731)
As
for calling upon the occupants of the graves and seeking their help,
and asking them to meet one’s needs and relieve distress, this is major
shirk that puts one beyond the pale of Islam.
Such actions
should be described as shirk and disbelief, but it should not be said
that the one who does that is a mushrik and a disbeliever, because
whoever does that and is ignorant is excused because of his ignorance,
unless proof is presented to him and he understands it, then he persists
in that. In that case he may be deemed to be a disbeliever and an
apostate.
Confusion concerning graves is something that many
people have fallen into, who were raised in an environment where
venerating graves and calling upon their occupants was regarded as a
sign of loving the righteous, especially if there was among them one of
the pseudo-scholars who are leading the people in venerating graves and
seeking the help of their occupants, claiming that they are mediators
who will bring people closer to Allah.
End quote from Kutub wa Rasaa’il al-‘Allaamah al-‘Abbaad (4/372)
(iv) The hadith of Hudhayfah ibn al-Yamaan (may Allah be pleased with him)
It
was narrated that Hudhayfah ibn al-Yamaan (may Allah be pleased with
him) said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon
him) said: “Islam will wear out as colour on a garment wears out, until
no one will know what fasting, prayer, Hajj and charity (zakaah) are.
The Book of Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, will be taken away
at night, and not one verse of it will be left on earth. And there will
be some people left, old men and old women, who will say: We saw our
fathers saying these words, Laa ilaaha ill-Allah, so we say them too.”
Silah
said to him: What good will (saying) Laa ilaaha ill-Allah do them, when
they do not know what fasting, prayer, Hajj and charity are?
Hudhayfah turned away from him. He repeated his question three times, and Hudhayfah turned away from him each time.
Then he turned to him on the third time and said: O Silah, it will save them from Hell, three times.
Narrated
by Ibn Maajah (4049), classed as saheeh by al-Buwaysiri in Misbaah
az-Zujaajah (2/291); classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Silsilat
al-Ahaadeeth as-Saheehah (1/171).
This hadith indicates that
those people will have nothing but faith in the general sense of
affirming Tawheed; they will know nothing of Islam except simply
affirming what they found their fathers saying.
Many people may
grow up in places and times where a lot of the teachings of Islam are
worn out, so that there is no one left to convey that with which Allah
sent His Messenger of the Book and wisdom, so they do not know much of
that with which Allah sent His Messenger, and there will be no one to
convey to them. Such a person cannot be deemed a disbeliever, therefore
the leading scholars are unanimously agreed that whoever is brought up
in the wilderness, far away from people of knowledge and faith, and is
new in Islam, and denies something of these obvious rulings that were
established through mutawaatir texts, is not to be deemed a disbeliever
until he learns what the Messenger brought.
End quote from Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (11/407)
Conclusion:
The
type of ignorance for which a person is excused is that whereby he does
not know about the truth and no one mentions the truth to him. This may
be a reason why he cannot be labelled a sinner and he cannot be
labelled as his deed would dictate. Then if he claims to be a Muslim and
testifies that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the
Messenger of Allah, then he is to be regarded as one of them. If he does
not claim to be a Muslim, then in this world he is to be deemed a
member of the religion to which he belongs.
As for the
hereafter, his case is like that of people who lived in the period
between Prophets, and he will be judged by Allah, may He be glorified
and exalted, on the Day of Resurrection. The soundest scholarly opinion
concerning them is that they will be tested in whatever way Allah wills;
whoever among them obeys will enter Paradise, and whoever among them
disobeys will enter Hell.
