Throughout
Islamic history, groups have arisen from time to time advocating
radically new and divergent ways of thinking about the religion. One of
the most radical and violent of these groups emerged during the
political mayhem of ‘Ali’s caliphate, which lasted from 656 to 661.
Known as the Kharijis, they emerged from a radical political position
and went on to develop particularly extreme beliefs that put them at
odds with most Muslims. While they never became a major political or
religious force in the Muslim world, they had major impact on their own
times and their ideology has been replicated numerous times by other
fringe groups throughout the past 1400 years.
Background
In
June of 656 CE (35 After Hijra), the caliph of the Muslim Empire,
‘Uthman bin ‘Affan (may Allah be pleased with him) was assassinated. The
killers were a group of discontented Muslim Egyptian soldiers, who took
issue with a ruling ‘Uthman made in a case between them and the
governor of Egypt. Unlike the previous two caliphs, Abu Bakr and ‘Umar
(may Allah be pleased with them),
who left behind at least some guidance as to how to pick a new caliph
(Abu Bakr simply appointed ‘Umar while ‘Umar appointed a council of six
to choose one of their own), ‘Uthman had not left behind a framework to
choose a new caliph.
The assassins, who now held effective control in the capital, Medina, wanted ‘Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) to be the new caliph. ‘Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) naturally
resisted such an appointment by murderers. Accepting the nomination
could be construed by others as his implicit approval of the rebels’
actions, which couldn’t be further from the truth considering that he
sent his own sons to defend ‘Uthman when the rebels barricaded him in
his house. But when some of the leading members of Medina’s community
told ‘Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) that
he was the Muslim nation’s best chance at peace and normalcy,
especially considering his status as the Prophet’s ﷺcousin and
son-in-law, he reluctantly took on the title of fourth caliph of the
Muslim Empire.
He
did, however, have some immediate opposition. Mu’awiya, the governor of
Syria, was a cousin of ‘Uthman (may Allah be pleased with him).
He was ready to pledge allegiance to the new caliph so long as ‘Ali
tried and punished the rebellious Egyptian soldiers who killed ‘Uthman.
‘Ali (may Allah be pleased with him),
however, did not believe doing so was in the interests of the Muslim
nation. He certainly did not approve of the soldier’s actions, but
punishing them could bring about an even bigger revolt, leading to more
bloodshed and trials for the young Muslim Empire, which ‘Ali was keen to
avoid.
Without
Mu’awiya’s support, however, ‘Ali was left without one of the largest
and most prosperous provinces of the empire. Mu’awiya was intensely
popular in Syria. He had been the governor there since the caliphate of
‘Umar, and did a good job of prudently managing the relations between
the region’s native Christian population and the newly introduced Arab
Muslims. ‘Ali, in turn, had strong support in Iraq, particularly in the
city of Kufa, where his supporters were incensed at Mu’awiya’s refusal
to pledge allegiance.
In
order to avoid an eventual civil war between Mu’awiya’s Syrian
supporters and Ali’s Iraqi ones, the two men agreed to an arbitration.
They figured allowing a third party to mediate the dispute and find a
solution, and potentially a new caliph, would be a peaceful end to a
perilous political divide.
But
‘Ali encountered an unforeseen problem with his arbitration. Some of
his supporters were so convinced that he was right in his choice not to
pursue justice for ‘Uthman’s murderers, that they were enraged at his
choice to go to arbitration. To them, ‘Ali had committed a major sin by
agreeing to deal with Mu’awiya. They seceded from ‘Ali’s camp and became
known as the Kharijis (also known as the Khawarj or Kharijites),
meaning “those who left”.
Khariji Ideas
The
development of Khariji ideas is an interesting lesson in how political
ideas can lead to new divergent ideas of Islam (a similar political to
religious process would form Shi’ism in later years). The Khariji
political position that ‘Ali made a mistake morphed into a belief that
any and all people who commit sins are unfit to rule. This alone was a
particularly extreme idea, but it didn’t end there.
Eventually,
the Kharijis argued that sins themselves were a form of kufr (disbelief
in God). They argued that if you commit a sin, you are in effect a
disbeliever in God and thus could be fought and killed, even if you were
a Companion of the Prophet ﷺor a caliph. Furthermore, if you disagreed
with their belief that sins are disbelief, you are by default a
disbeliever and could be fought and killed.
Khariji
beliefs did not have much basis in actual Islamic theology. Takfir
(declaring people disbelievers) is in fact a very specific and rare
thing in mainstream Muslim belief, with the majority opinion, as stated
in the ‘Aqida of Imam al-Tahawi, being that the only thing that
invalidates someone’s status as a Muslim is openly declaring that they
do not believe that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad ﷺis His
messenger. Thus most of the Kharijis were not educated people well
versed in the Qur’an and the sayings of the Prophet. The majority were
desert Bedouin raiders who made up for their lack of understanding of
Islam with a strong zeal for Khariji beliefs, no matter how
intellectually shallow they were.
Khariji
ideas never took hold with the general population. Besides being a
distortion of the Prophet’s teachings, Khariji beliefs were simply too
extreme for most people to be on board with. But that didn’t stop the
small group of Kharijis from having a major impact on the Muslim world.
In
line with their beliefs, Kharijis attempted to assassinate all the
political leaders who took part in the arbitration that led to their
establishment. They failed in their attempts to kill Mu’awiya and ‘Amr
ibn al-’As, who supported Mu’awiya and ruled Egypt in his name. But in
661 they succeeded in killing the caliph, ‘Ali, in Kufa. The
assassination of the Prophet’s cousin and son in law brought about the
end of the Rashidun era of the caliphate and the beginning of the
Umayyad Caliphate, led by Mu’awiya.
The
Kharijis continued to be a nuisance for the Umayyad and Abbasid
caliphates for centuries. They never came to hold major cities in their
numerous rebellions, but would use their familiarity with the deserts to
roam throughout the Muslim world, harassing and terrorizing populations
that did not accept their beliefs. In North Africa, they managed to get
some support for their cause from groups of indigenous Berbers by
playing off of the tensions between them and the ruling Arabs.
Eventually,
the Khariji movement would die out slowly, a victim of its own
extremism that prevented it from ever being accepted by most Muslims.
One strand of them managed to moderate to some extent and developed into
the Ibadi sect, which today forms the majority of Oman’s population.
But while the Khariji movement itself did not last, their concept of
takfir of sinners has been resurrected from time to time by numerous
extremist groups, even being echoed by some modern political movements.
No comments:
Post a Comment